Effects of Natural Virus Infection on Field-Grown Eight Tomato Genotypes (Lycopersicon esculentum)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/jjas.v19i3.203

Keywords:

Tomato genotypes, Field-grown, natural viral infection.

Abstract

Tomato is the leading fruit vegetable in the world with over 177.04 metric tons of world production on a yearly basis but the production is generally more hindered by diseases than pests, as it is grown all through the world.  This study evaluated the effects of natural virus infection on eight tomato genotypes, carried out at the Teaching and Research Farm of Federal University Oye-Ekiti. The eight tomato genotypes were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. Data collected were averaged and analyzed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 9.4) and significant means separated by the Tukey test. The results showed that a percentage increase in disease incidence among the genotypes was directly associated with decreasing yield but was not significant. Therefore, the viral disease incidence is associated with a reduction in the fruit yield of tomatoes but some tomato genotypes like; F1 COBRA26 and “TIWANTIWA” with high seedling vigor had significant fruit yield under natural virus infection on the field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Opeyemi Tunde Osundare, FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OYE-EKITI

Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, Federal University Oye, P.M.B. 373, Ekiti State, Nigeria

Ayodele Anthony Fajinmi, Federal University Oye, P.M.B. 373, Ekiti State, Nigeria

Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, Federal University Oye, P.M.B. 373, Ekiti State, Nigeria

Ademola Ridwan Adelu, The University of Alabama, USA

College of Communication and Information Sciences, The University of Alabama, USA

References

Arogundade, O., Balogun O. S, and Fawole, O.B., (2007). Incidence and Severity of Viral and Fungal Diseases of Tomato. Agricultural research journal volume 9 (2): 53 – 60

Brunt, A. A., Crabtree, K., Dallwitz, M. J, Gibbs, A. J., Watson, L.,Zurcher, E. J., eds., (1995). Plant Viruses Online: Descriptions and Lists from the VIDE Database. Version: 20th August 1996. Published online www.agls.uidaho.edu/ebi/vdie/refs.htm.

Ceponis, M.J., and Butterfield, L.E., (1979). “Losses in fresh tomatoes at the retail and consumer levels in the greater New York area.” Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 104:751-754.

Dias J.S., (2011). World importance, marketing and trading vegetables. Acta Hortic. 2011;921:153-169. Doi.10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.921.18

Fajinmi, O. B., Arogundade, O., Amosu, S. A., Adeoye, P.O. and Olaleye, O., (2012). Seasonal changes as it affects the incidence of viral and fungal diseases of tomato. Continental J. Agricultural Science 6 (2): 18 – 22

Hanssen, M., Lapidot, M., and Thomma, B.P., (2010). Emerging viral disease of tomato crops. American Phytopathological Society 23 (5): 539-548

Jones Rogers and Rayapati Naidu A., (2019). Global dimensions of plant virus diseases: current status and future perspectives. Annual review of virology Volume 6:387-409 doi.org/10.1146/annurev-virology-092818-015606

Lapidot, M., and Friedmann, M., (2002). Breeding for resistance to whitefly-transmitted geminiviruses. Annals of Applied Biology. 140: 109-127.

Mumford, R., Macarthur, R., Boonham, N., (2016). The role and challenges of new diagnostic technology in plant biosecurity. Food secure. 8, 103-109.doi:10.1007/s12571-015-0533-y

Olson, S.M., D.N. Maynard, G.J. Hochmuth, C.S. Vavrina, W.M. Stall, M.T. Momol, S.E. Webb, T.G. Taylor, S.A. Smith, and Simmone E. H., (2005). Tomato Production in Florida in Vegetable Handbook for Florida 2005-2006. Edited by S.M. Olson and E.H. Simmone. Univ. of Florida IFAS Extension. Gainesville, Fla. pp. 357-362

Panno, S., Davino, S., Rubio, L., Rangel, E., Davino M., Garcia-Hernandez, J., et al., (2012). Simultaneous detection of the seven main tomato-infecting RNA viruses by two multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions. Journal of Virology Methods 186, 152-156. Doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.08.003

Qun Sun, Jian-hua Wang, Bao-qi Sun. (2007). Advances on seed vigor physiological and genetic mechanisms. Agricultural Sciences in China, Volume 6(9) Pp 1060-1066 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(07)60147-3

Ramyabharathi SA, Meena B, Raguchander T., (2012). Induction of chitinase and b-1,3- glucanase PR proteins in tomato through liquid formulated Bacillus subtilis EPCO 16 against Fusarium wiltToday's. Biological Sciences : Research & Review . 2012;1(1):50-60.

Savage-Finch W.E. and Bassel G.W., (2015). Seed vigor and crop establishment: extending performance beyond adaptation, Journal of experimental botany, Volume 67 (3), Pp 567-591. https: doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv490

SAS. Statistical Analysis System, version 9.4 edition. (2017). AS User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary WorldAtlas. 2021. The most populous vegetables in the World. Accessed online www.worldatlas.com 12 December 2021

Downloads

Published

01-09-2023

How to Cite

Osundare, O. T. ., Fajinmi, A. A. . ., & Adelu, A. R. . (2023). Effects of Natural Virus Infection on Field-Grown Eight Tomato Genotypes (Lycopersicon esculentum). Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 19(3), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.35516/jjas.v19i3.203

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2022-07-06
Accepted 2022-10-26
Published 2023-09-01

Most read articles by the same author(s)