Effect of Endometritis on Caesarean Section Scar Thickness: A Sonographic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v59i3.2508Keywords:
Caesarean scar, Endometritis, Pelvic inflammatory disease, Caesarean sectionAbstract
Background: Endometritis is an inflammation of the inner lining of the uterus, often caused by infection. It is a common postpartum complication, particularly following a caesarean section (C-section). The thickness of the C-section scar is an important factor in assessing uterine integrity and predicting the risk of complications in subsequent pregnancies.
Objective: To examine the effect of endometritis on caesarean section scar thickness in females.
Materials & Methods: This was a case-control study conducted at the University Ultrasound clinic, Green town, Lahore for the duration of 7 months. Convenient sampling technique was used to collect the data. The research utilized transabdominal ultrasound scans, employing high-frequency curvilinear transducers of 3.5–6MHz (Toshiba Xario).
Results: The mean thickness of the C-section scar was significantly different between the two groups: 2.46 ± 0.54 mm in women without endometritis and 5.29 ± 0.80 mm in those with endometritis (P = 0.000). The number of scars visualized sonographically did not significantly differ between groups. Fluid around the endometrium was significantly more common in the endometritis group (45.3%) compared to none in the no endometritis group (P = 0.000). The number of previous C-sections did not significantly differ between groups (P = 0.580), with similar distributions across both groups. The duration of the C-section procedure was significantly shorter in the endometritis group, averaging 2.79 ± 1.22 minutes compared to 14.5 ± 6.22 minutes in the no endometritis group (P = 0.000).
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that endometritis significantly affects the thickness of C-section scars, indicating impaired healing. The presence of fluid around the endometrium and increased endometrium thickness were additional markers of this adverse effect.
References
Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Mathews T. Births: final data for 2014. 2015.
Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat Caesarean deliveries. 2006;107(6):1226-32.
Burrows LJJO, Gynecology. Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus Caesarean delivery. 2004;104(3):633-4.
Lev-Toaff AS, Baka JJ, Toaff ME, Friedman AC, Radecki PD, Caroline DFJO, et al. Diagnostic imaging in puerperal febrile morbidity. 1991;78(1):50-5.
Rooholamini S, Au AH, Hansen GC, Kioumehr F, Dadsetan MR, Chow PP, et al. Imaging of pregnancy-related complications. 1993;13(4):753-70.
Sawaga GF, Grady D, Kerlikowske K, Grimes DAJO, Gynecology. Antibiotics at the time of induced abortion: the case for universal prophylaxis based on a meta-analysis. 1996;87(5 Part 2):884-90.
Bisset R. Differential Diagnosis in Obstetrics and Gynecologic Ultrasound-E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013.
Tower AM, Frishman GNJ Jomig. Caesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications. 2013;20(5):562-72.
Liu S, Shi L, Shi JJIJoG, Obstetrics. Impact of endometrial cavity fluid on assisted reproductive technology outcomes. 2016;132(3):278-83.
Michels TCJAFP. Chronic endometritis. 1995;52(1):217-22.
Yang X, Pan X, Cai M, Zhang B, Liang X, Liu GJFiM. Microbial flora changes in Caesarean section uterus and its possible correlation with inflammation. 2021;8:651938.
Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Meyn LA, Amortegui AJ, Sweet RLJO, Gynecology. Subclinical pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility. 2012;120(1):37-43.
Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJJS. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. 2014;345(6198):760-5.
Boyle AK, Rinaldi SF, Norman JE, Stock SJJJori. Preterm birth: Inflammation, fetal injury and treatment strategies. 2017;119:62-6.
Wu D, Kimura F, Zheng L, Ishida M, Niwa Y, Hirata K, et al. Chronic endometritis modifies decidualization in human endometrial stromal cells. 2017;15(1):1-10.
Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, Dawson A, Drife J, Garrod D, et al. Saving Mothers' Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. 2011;118:1-203.
Osser, S., et al. (2010). Impact of postpartum infections on uterine scar healing. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 36(4), 899-904.
Pompeii, L. A., et al. (2016). Sonographic evaluation of uterine scars in postpartum women with infections. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 48(2), 233-239.
Acharya, G., et al. (2015). Sonographic markers of endometritis in postpartum women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 213(4), 576.e1-576.e6.
Kankuri, M., et al. (2013). Surgical duration and postoperative infections: a review. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 171(2), 281-285.
Halis, H., et al. (2012). Endometrial thickness in women with postpartum infections: a sonographic study. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 74(4), 299-305.
Slavin, V., et al. (2011). Abnormal uterine findings in postpartum women with infections. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 24(5), 726-730.
Mulic-Lutvica A, Axelsson OJAoegS. Postpartum ultrasound in women with postpartum endometritis, after Caesarean section and after manual evacuation of the placenta. 2007;86(2):210-7.
