The Acute vs Chronic Post-CABG Complications: Does Gender Matter? A Retrospective Cohort Study from the Jordan University Hospital Records

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v59i4.4104

Keywords:

visual abstract in the manuscript, cc google images

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to examine coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and its acute and chronic postoperative complications at Jordan University Hospital (JUH).

Methods: JUH’s electronic health records (EHR) and surgery databases of 238 patients were reviewed from 1st January 2010 to 5th July 2024, regarding their relation to gender, techniques used in the surgery, and postoperative complications of CABG.

Results: The study cohort included 238 patients undergoing CABG, comprising 52 females (21.85%) and 186 males (78.15%). Postoperative complications were analyzed by gender. Among females, 17.31% (9/52) experienced complications, while 82.69% (43/52) had none. In males, 10.22% (19/186) exhibited complications, and 89.78% (167/186) were complication-free, yielding a total of 210 patients (210/238, 88.24%) without complications. Chi-square analysis revealed no significant association between gender and complication incidence (χ²=1.35, p=0.246). Complications were further stratified into acute and chronic categories. Females demonstrated the following: 9.62% (5/52) with acute complications (e.g., nosocomial infection), 3.85% (2/52) with concurrent acute and chronic complications (e.g., nosocomial infection and cataract), and 3.85% (2/52) with chronic complications (e.g., cataract). Among males, 3.76% (7/186) presented with acute complications, 0.54% (1/186) with both acute and chronic complications, and 5.91% (11/186) with chronic complications. A Chi-square test evaluating gender-based differences in acute versus chronic complication susceptibility showed no significant association (χ²=6.84, p=0.077; Monte Carlo p=0.425), with Monte Carlo simulation applied due to low expected cell frequencies. These findings suggest no statistically significant relationship between gender and the development of post-CABG complications, either in overall incidence or subtype (acute vs chronic).

Conclusion: Descriptive statistics showed that females had a higher incidence of complications than males overall and acutely, while males tend to develop their complications chronically. However, there is no significant association between gender and complications, either the total complications or the subclassified ones.

References

Ramsingh, R., & Bakaeen, F. G. (2025, March). Coronary artery bypass grafting: Practice trends and projections. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 92(3), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.92a.23071

A.-E. Al-Shudifat et al., “Risk factors for coronary artery disease in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography in Jordan.,” *BMC Cardiovasc. Disord.*, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 183, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0620-4.

Al-Ajlouni, Y. A., Al Ta'ani, O., Shamaileh, G., et al. “The burden of Cardiovascular diseases in Jordan: a longitudinal analysis from the global burden of disease study, 1990-2019.” *BMC Public Health, 24*(1), 879. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18316-0.

Hammoudeh, A. J., Tabbalat, R., Alhaddad, I. A., et al. “Outcomes of Middle Eastern patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: The primary analysis of the First Jordanian PCI Registry.” *Heart Views*.

D. Vervoort, M. Elbatarny, R. Rocha, and S. E. Fremes, “Reconstruction Technique Options for Achieving Total Arterial Revascularization and Multiple Arterial Grafting.,” *J. Clin. Med.*, vol. 12, no. 6, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/jcm12062275.

Alexander JH, Smith PK. “Coronary-artery bypass grafting.” *N Engl J Med* 2016;374: 1954–64. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1406944.

Stefan Thelin, Ivy Susanne Modrau, Olov Duvernoy, et al. “No-touch vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: A registry-based randomized clinical trial.” *European Heart Journal*, 2025;, ehaf018.

https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf018.

Samano N, Geijer H, Liden M, et al. “The no-touch saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass grafting maintains a patency, after 16 years, comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: a randomized trial.” *J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg*, 2015;150: 880–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.027.

Calafiore, A. M., Prapas, S., Condello, I., et al. “The Saphenous Vein Graft: Can a Frog Become a Princess?” *Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)*, vol. 60, no. 12, p. 1915.

https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60121915.

T. Montrief, A. Koyfman, and B. Long, “Coronary artery bypass graft surgery complications: A review for emergency clinicians.,” *Am. J. Emerg. Med.*, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 2289–2297, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.014.

R. Sadeghi, R. Miri, N. Kachoueian, M. Sistanizad, and R. Hassanpour, “Differences in gender and outcomes following isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.,” *ARYA Atheroscler.*, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.48305/arya.2022.26640.2819.

V. S. Thakare, N. G. Sontakke, P. S. Wasnik, and D. Kanyal, “Recent Advances in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Techniques and Outcomes: A Narrative Review.,” *Cureus*, vol. 15, no. 9, p. e45511, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.7759/cureus.45511.

Alamri, H. M., Alotaibi, T. O., Alghatani, A. A., et al. “Effect of Gender on Postoperative Outcome and Duration of Ventilation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG).” *Cureus, vol. 15, no. 4*, e37717, 2023.

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37717.

Dixon, L. K., Dimagli, A., Di Tommaso, E., et al. “Females have an increased risk of short-term mortality after cardiac surgery compared to males: Insights from a national database.” *J Card Surg.*, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 3507–3519, 2022. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16928.

Matyal, R., Qureshi, N. Q., Mufarrih, S. H., et al. “Update: Gender differences in CABG outcomes—Have we bridged the gap?” *PLoS One*, vol. 16, no. 9, e0255170, 2021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255170.

Nurkkala, J., Kauko, A., Palmu, J., et al. “Sex differences in coronary artery bypass grafting-related morbidity and mortality.” *Front Cardiovasc Med.*, vol. 9, 1021363, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1021363.

Nicolini, F., Vezzani, A., Fortuna, D., et al. “Gender differences in outcomes following isolated coronary artery bypass grafting: Long-term results.” *J Cardiothorac Surg*, vol. 11, 144, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0538-4.

Arif, R., Farag, M., Gertner, V., et al. “Female Gender and Differences in Outcome after Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Does Age Play a Role?” *PLoS ONE*, vol. 11, no. 2, e0145371, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145371.

Jang, W. J., Choi, K. H., Kim, J., et al. “Impact of gender on mid-term prognosis of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.” *PLoS ONE*, vol. 18, no. 3, e0279030, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279030.

Chua, T. K., Gao, F., Chia, S. Y., et al. “Long-term mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and risk factors for mortality.” *J Cardiothorac Surg*, vol. 19, 429, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02943-0.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. “Unravelling the Difference Between Men and Women in Post-CABG Survival.” *Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine*, 2025.

ESC Joint Working Groups on Cardiovascular Surgery and the Cellular Biology of the Heart. “Position Paper: Peri-Operative Myocardial Injury and Infarction in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.” *Eur Heart J.*, 2017.

Hartono, B., Munawar, D. A., & Munawar, M. “Management of Heart Failure After CABG.” *Coronary Graft Failure*. Springer, Cham, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26515-5_53.

Elhassan, H., Amjad, R., Palaniappan, U., et al. “The negative pressure wound therapy for prevention of sternal wound infection: Can we reduce infection rate after the use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries?” *J Cardiothorac Surg*, vol. 19, 87, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-02589-y.

Wounds International. *World Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS) Consensus Document: Closed Surgical Incision Management—Understanding the Role of NPWT*. 2016. https://www.woundsinternational.com/resources/details/consensus-document-closed-surgical-incision-management-understanding-the-role-of-npwt-wme.

Farsad, B., Bakhshandeh, H., & Mahboubi, S. “Drug Utilization and Evaluation of Prophylactic Antibiotics in CABG Patients.” *Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal*, vol. 9, pp

Downloads

Published

2025-09-08

How to Cite

Abu hantash, N., Abu Shirbi, S., Natheer, D. ., Yasin, J., Al-Makhamreh, E., Rabah, R., Maaita, F., Al-Smady, M., & Al-Makhamreh, H. (2025). The Acute vs Chronic Post-CABG Complications: Does Gender Matter? A Retrospective Cohort Study from the Jordan University Hospital Records . Jordan Medical Journal, 59(4). https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v59i4.4104

Issue

Section

Articles