Assessing Soil and Subsurface Carbon Sequestration: A Quantitative Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35516/jjas.v21i2.2588

Keywords:

carbon sequestration, magnetotellurics, gravity, soil organic carbon, geophysical techniques, climate change mitigation

Abstract

This study examined the feasibility of using two geographical features: magnetic vessel science and gravimetry, and monitoring the amount of carbon adsorbed in soil and subsurface layers. For the purpose of our study, we conducted field campaigns at various locations where we collected magnetotelluric gravity data by using of specialized equipment and integrated it with geological and environmental data analyses. Magnetotellurics measurements of soil electrical resistivity show a strong negative correlation with organic carbon concentration (e.g., S010 in situ has an electrical resistivity of 82.671 Ωm and organic carbon content of 3,786%). This made it possible to estimate the amount of carbon stored in the soil. Gravimetric changes below the ground were linked to higher levels of CO2 saturation (for example, site G003 had a 0.912 mGal change and a 25.621% CO2 saturation), which helped scientists figure out what kind of carbon storage reservoirs might be there. Using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models and nonlinear regression techniques (Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm), time series analyses showed that it was possible to track the dynamics of CO2 injection (gravimetric anomalies went from 0.000 to 1.756 mGal when 0.623 Mt of CO2 was injected) and CO2 plume migration (resistivity went from 35.671 to 7.789 Ω•m as the plume spread to 2.16 km2). The findings contribute to developing effective climate change mitigation strategies, promoting sustainable land management practices, and informing carbon capture and storage initiatives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Collins Molua, University of Delta, Agbor, Nigeria

Physics Department, University of Delta, Agbor Delta, Nigeria

References

Adamu, H., Umar, Y., Akanang, H., & Sabo, A. (2021). Evaluation of carbon sequestration potential of soils―What is missing?. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2021.98003

Alcalde, J., Flude, S., Wilkinson, M., Johnson, G., Edlmann, K., Bond, C., Scott, V., Gilfillan, S., Ogaya, X., & Haszeldine, R. (2018). Estimating geological CO₂ storage security to deliver on climate mitigation. Nature Communications, 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04423-1

Ayoubi, S., Abazari, P., & Zeraatpisheh, M. (2018). Soil great group discrimination using magnetic susceptibility technique in a semi-arid region, central Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3941-4

Fawad, M., & Mondol, N. (2021). Monitoring geological storage of CO₂: A new approach. Scientific Reports, 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85346-8

Heikkinen, J., Keskinen, R., Regina, K., Honkanen, H., & Nuutinen, V. (2020). Estimation of carbon stocks in boreal cropland soils ‐ Methodological considerations. European Journal of Soil Science, 72, 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13033

Katterbauer, K., Shehri, A., & Qasim, A. (2022). A quantum gravity AI framework for CO₂ storage monitoring and optimization. Day 2 Tue, November 01, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2118/210841-ms

Liu, S., Shen, H., Chen, S., Zhao, X., Biswas, A., Jia, X., Shi, Z., & Fang, J. (2019). Estimating forest soil organic carbon content using vis-NIR spectroscopy: Implications for large-scale soil carbon spectroscopic assessment. Geoderma. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.04.003

Nayak, A., Rahman, M., Naidu, R., Dhal, B., Swain, C., Nayak, A., Tripathi, R., Shahid, M., Islam, M., & Pathak, H. (2019). Current and emerging methodologies for estimating carbon sequestration in agricultural soils: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 665, 890–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.125

Raza, A., Gholami, R., Rezaee, R., Rasouli, V., & Rabiei, M. (2019). Significant aspects of carbon capture and storage – A review. Petroleum, 5, 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2018.12.007

Reddy, N., Badole, W., Nirgulkar, M., & Bhoyar, K. (2021). Impact of organic, inorganic and integrated nutrient management practices on carbon pool and nutrient availability of perennial, annual and seasonal crops grown in Nagpur district. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 10, 1739–1751. https://doi.org/10.20546/IJCMAS.2021.1001.204

Thoumazeau, A., Chevallier, T., Baron, V., Rakotondrazafy, N., Panklang, P., Marichal, R., Kibblewhite, M., Sebag, D., Tivet, F., Bessou, C., Gay, F., & Brauman, A. (2020). A new in-field indicator to assess the impact of land management on soil carbon dynamics. Geoderma, 375, 114496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114496

Tifafi, M., Guenet, B., & Hatté, C. (2018). Large differences in global and regional total soil carbon stock estimates based on SoilGrids, HWSD, and NCSCD: Intercomparison and evaluation based on field data from USA, England, Wales, and France. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 32, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005678

Vasco, D., Dixon, T., Ferretti, A., & Samsonov, S. (2020). Monitoring the fate of injected CO₂ using geodetic techniques. Geophysics, 39, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle39010029.1

Xu, L., Li, Q., Myers, M., Chen, Q., & Li, X. (2019). Application of nuclear magnetic resonance technology to carbon capture, utilization, and storage: A review. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.01.003

Zhang, R., & Li, T. (2019). Joint inversion of 2D gravity gradiometry and magnetotelluric data in mineral exploration. Minerals. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9090541

Zhang, R., Zhang, L., Li, T., Liu, C., He, H., & Deng, X. (2023). Gravity inversion with a binary structure constraint imposed by magnetotelluric data and its application to a Carlin-type gold deposit. Geophysics. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2022-0391.1

Downloads

Published

01-06-2025

How to Cite

Molua, C. (2025). Assessing Soil and Subsurface Carbon Sequestration: A Quantitative Analysis. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.35516/jjas.v21i2.2588

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2024-04-24
Accepted 2024-12-25
Published 2025-06-01