Effect of Bedding Type on Bird Performance and Gut Health
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35516/jjas.v21i1.1656Keywords:
Broilers, wood shavings, Envirobed, gut healthAbstract
This study was conducted to compare wood shavings with Envirobed to determine the effect of bedding source on estimates of the amount of bedding consumed, and on some of the gut health indicators/microbial biomarkers (digesta dry matter content and the incidence of Campylobacter jejuni and Clostridium perfringens in the caecum of birds) and diet dry matter availability (assessed using titanium dioxide as a marker). A total of 144 Ross 308 one-day-old broiler chicks were randomly allocated to one of two bedding material treatments (Envirobed or wood shavings). Bird weight was greater for broilers kept on wood shavings, but birds consumed more Envirobed bedding and this was associated with drier digesta, suggesting a lower risk of Foot Pad Dermatitis with Envirobed. The caecal presence of either Campylobacter jejuni or Clostridium perfringens was not affected by the source of bedding. Rearing birds on wood shavings appears to be beneficial to broiler performance.
Downloads
References
Akhtar, M., Tariq, A. F., Awais, M. M., Iqbal, Z., Muhammad, F., Shahid, M., & Hiszczynska-Sawicka, E. (2012). Studies on wheat bran arabinoxylan for its immunostimulatory and protective effects against avian coccidiosis. Carbohydrate Polymers, 90(1), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.016
Colleen, S., Philip, T., Leftwich, E., Burton, E., Scholey, D., Bed-Ford, M. R., & Brearley, C. A. (2023). Accentuating the positive and eliminating the negative: Efficacy of TiO2 as digestibility index marker for poultry nutrition studies. PLOS ONE, 18(6), e0284724. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284724
Costa, A., Vaz, V., Silva, D., & Rodrigues, F. (2021). Performance and meat quality of broiler chickens reared on two different litter materials and at two stocking densities. British Poultry Science, 62(3), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2021.1893683
Dahiya, J., Wilkie, D., Van Kessel, A., & Drew, M. (2006). Potential strategies for controlling necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens in the post-antibiotic era. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 129(1–2), 60–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.01.001
Estefanía, N. R., Matthew, B., Sanjay, K., & Cortney, L. (2024). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in conventional and no antibiotics ever broiler farms. Journal of Food Protection, 87(3), 100238. https://doi.org/10.4315/JFP-23-256
Hetland, H., Svihus, B., & Choct, M. (2005). Role of insoluble fibre on gizzard activity in layers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 14(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/14.1.38
Hump, R., & Cravener, T. (2007). Evaluation of Envirobed® litter product for broiler production. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(4), 592–593.
Humphrey, S., Chaloner, G., Kemmett, K., Davidson, N., Williams, N., Kipar, A., Humphrey, T., & Wigley, P. (2014). Campylobacter jejuni is not merely a commensal in commercial broiler chickens and affects bird welfare. MBio, 5(2), e01364-14. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01364-14
Jakub, B., Mirosław, B., Małgorzata, G., & Sebastian, W. (2023). Chopped straw and coffee husks affect bedding chemical composition and the performance and footpad condition of broiler chickens. Scientific Reports, 13, 6600. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33859-9
Jan, S., & Peter, J. (2023). The effect of bedding materials on performance, welfare, and behaviour of broiler chickens. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 24(2), 311–321.
Jorgensen, F., Ellis-Iversen, J., Rushton, S., Bull, S., Harris, S., Bryan, S., Gonzalez, A., & Humphrey, T. (2011). Influence of season and geography on Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli subtypes in housed broiler flocks reared in Great Britain. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77(11), 3741–3748. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02757-10
Keyburn, A. L., Boyce, J. D., Vaz, P., Bannam, T. L., Ford, M. E., Parker, D., Di Rubbo, A., Rood, J. I., & Moore, R. J. (2008). NetB is a new toxin that is associated with avian necrotic enteritis caused by Clostridium perfringens. PLoS Pathogens, 4(1), e26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0040026
Keyburn, A. L., Yan, X.-X., Bannam, T. L., Van Immerseel, F., Rood, J. I., & Moore, R. J. (2010). Association between avian necrotic enteritis and Clostridium perfringens strains expressing NetB toxin. Veterinary Research, 41, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9716-41-6
Malone, G., Chaloupka, G., & Saylor, W. (1983). Influence of litter type and size on broiler performance. I. Factors affecting litter consumption. Poultry Science, 62(8), 1741–1746. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0621741
Muhammad, M., Ehsan, K., Sohail, A., Samia, N., Mubashar, A., & Mohammad, Q. (2024). An updated review on alternative strategies to antibiotics against necrotic enteritis in commercial broiler chickens. World's Poultry Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2024.2368836
Teixeira, A. S., De Oliveira, M. C., Menezes, J. F., Gouvea, B. M., Teixeira, S. R., & Gomes, A. R. (2015). Poultry litter of wood shavings and/or sugarcane bagasse: Animal performance and bed quality. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 28(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rccp.2015.08.001
Timbermont, L., Haesebrouck, F., Ducatelle, R., & Van Immerseel, F. (2011). Necrotic enteritis in broilers: An updated review on the pathogenesis. Avian Pathology, 40(4), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2011.582456
Van Hierden, Y. M., Korte, S. M., Ruesink, E. W., Van Reenen, C. G., Engel, B., Koolhaas, J. M., & Blokhuis, H. J. (2002). The development of feather pecking behaviour and targeting of pecking in chicks from a high and low feather pecking line of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 77(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00251-5
VN., Gupta, P. S., Pramanik, K. D., Singh, S., Gautam, P., Gautam, B., Singh, G., Pandey, D., & Nandan. (2020). Effect of different litter materials on growth performance of broiler chickens. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, SP-8(2), 88–92.
Walid G. Al Hakeem, Emily E. Cason, Daniel Adams, Shahna Fathima, Revathi Shanmugasundaram, Jeferson Lourenco, & Ramesh K. Selvaraj. (2024). Characterizing the effect of Campylobacter jejuni challenge on growth performance, cecal microbiota, and cecal short-chain fatty acid concentrations in broilers. Animals, 14(3), 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14030473
Yasiri, F., Andrea C., & Gerardo S. (2024). Prediction of edapho-climatic parameters in the incidence of Campylobacter spp. in northwestern Mexico. PLOS Global Public Health, 4(4), e0002812. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002812
Yugal R., Bindari, R. J., Moore, T. T. H. Van, Matthew Hilliar, Shu-Biao Wu, Stephen W. Walkden-Brown, & Priscilla F. Gerber. (2021). Microbial communities of poultry house dust, excreta and litter are partially representative of the microbiota of chicken cecum and ileum. PLOS ONE, 16(8), e0255633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255633
Zuami, M., Maria, M., & Jenny, Q. (2020). Clostridium perfringens as a foodborne pathogen in broiler production: Pathophysiology and potential strategies for controlling necrotic enteritis. PLOS ONE, 16(8), e0255633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255633
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2024-07-17
Published 2025-03-01